The Commission adopted on 3 October new measures restricting the use of PFAS (perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances) in fire fighting foams under the REACH Regulation, the EU’s chemicals legislation. This is an important measure that protects people and the environment from the risks posed by PFASs.
The restriction marks an important step towards the Commission’s goal of minimising PFAS emissions. Fire fighting foams have been a major source of pollution in the EU. Without this restriction, around 470 tonnes of such chemicals would continue to be released into the environment each year, polluting soil and water. In addition, firefighters would also continue to be exposed to PFASs in the foams used.
PFAS-free fire fighting foams are available and the operators concerned need sufficient time to make a smooth transition to PFAS-free alternatives. Therefore, the Commission has proposed specific transition periods for different sectors.
This restriction is based on the scientific assessment of the committees of the European Chemicals Agency and has successfully passed the scrutiny of the European Parliament and the Council.
Next steps
This restriction will formally enter into force 20 days after publication in the Official Journal. It will take effect after transition periods of between 12 months and 10 years, depending on use, allowing time for substitution by safer and more effective alternatives.
Context
PFASs are called “chemicals for life” because they do not break down in the natural environment. They require special attention in view of the large number of cases of contamination of soil and water, including drinking water. Over the last 20 years, the EU has increasingly taken measures to control the risks from exposure to PFASs. Today’s restriction covers this type of chemicals in fire fighting foams, ensuring a complete transition to PFAS-free fire fighting foams in the EU. The proposed restriction will aim to limit contamination and human exposure to these chemicals.
More information: European Commission
Leave a Reply